- Mar 5, 2023
- 1 min read

6. Burns are done carefully to protect sensitive areas - WRONG

While the prescribed burning program was designed not to burn high value environmental assets (such as wetlands, streams, granite rocks and endangered species), all areas are now subject to the same high-intensity burning practices.

Some examples of wetland decimated byt prescribed burns can be seen in this ABC Landline can be see in this ABC Landline segment (starts at 3:35).

1. Burning is based on latest science - WRONG

The 2,000 sq km per annum ‘indicative target’ for prescribed burns is based on a 2009 study which concluded that this would reduce the...

2. Bush must be burnt to protect us - WRONG

After burning, or other disturbances such as logging, the forest responds with dense understory growth, increasing the 'fuel load' and...

3. Burns are cool fires - WRONG

The over 75% of prescribed burns are done by dropping flammable materials (incendiaries) from the air every 100 - 200 m over large areas....

4. Burns don't harm wildlife - WRONG

WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGERY BELOW Many animals can't escape the large areas being burnt rapidly, particularly when the fires are lit from...

5. Burns are like Indigenous practices - WRONG

Traditional burning was nuanced, small scale, selective and seasonal and protected key natural assets. This was ‘right way burning’ which...

6. Burns are done carefully to protect sensitive areas - WRONG

While the prescribed burning program was designed not to burn high value environmental assets (such as wetlands, streams, granite rocks...

7. Burns are a natural part of the ecosystem - WRONG

Burns are done at much higher frequency and in different seasons to the natural fire cycle. The south-west of Australia evolved with...

8. Burning is the only way to protect people and property - WRONG

Existing technology developed in Australia is proven to detect all fires within 10 minutes of ignition, even fires the size of a small...